Figure of Speech Definition and Examples

In common usage, a figure of speech is a word or phrase that means something more or something other than it seems to say—the opposite of a  literal  expression. As Professor Brian Vickers has observed, It is a sad proof of the decline of rhetoric that in modern colloquial English the phrase a figure of speech has come to mean something false, illusory or insincere. In rhetoric, a figure of speech is a type of figurative language (such as metaphor, irony, understatement, or anaphora) that departs from conventional word  order or meaning. Some common figures of speech are  alliteration, anaphora, antimetabole, antithesis, apostrophe, assonance, hyperbole, irony, metonymy, onomatopoeia, paradox, personification, pun, simile, synecdoche, and understatement. 1:15 Watch Now: Common Figures of Speech Explained Just a Figure of Speech: The Lighter Side Following are a few figures of speech that are a bit tongue in cheek. Mr. Burns, American History X-cellent,  The Simpsons, 2010 Break a leg, everyone (to a passing employee). I said break a leg. (The employee then breaks his own leg with a hammer.) My God, man! That was a  figure of speech. Youre fired! Peter Falk and Robert Walker, Jr., Mind Over Mayhem, Columbo, 1974 Lieutenant Columbo: So you had an hour to kill before you had to get back to the airport. Dr. Neil Cahill: I take it you mean to use that phrase, to kill. You mean that literally. Lieutenant Columbo: No, I was just using a figure of speech. Im not making an accusation. Jonathan Baumbach, My Father More or Less, Fiction Collective, 1982 What if there were a gun to your head, what would you say?Whose gun are you thinking of putting to my head?It was just a figure of speech, for Gods sake. You dont have to be so literal about it.Its only a figure of speech when you dont have a gun in your possession. Carmen Carter et al., Doomsday World (Star Trek: The Next Generation, No. 12), 1990 Yes, said Coleridge. The new Commercial Trading Hall....The emptiest building in town, gentlemen. If there are twenty people in it at any given time, Ill eat my tricorder on the spot.Data looked at the archaeologist, and  Geordi caught the look. Thats  only a figure of speech, Data. She doesnt really intend to eat it.The android nodded. I am familiar with the expression, Geordi. Metaphor as a Figure of Thought A  metaphor  is a  trope  or  figure of speech,  in which an implied comparison is made between two unlike things that actually have something in common, as these quotes show. Ning Yu, Imagery, Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition, 1996 In its broad sense, a metaphor is not only a figure of speech but also a figure of thought. It is a mode of apprehension and a means of perceiving and expressing something in a radically different way. In such a sense, figurative images are not simply decorative but serve to reveal aspects of experience in a new light. Teddy Roosevelt and the Treasure of Ursa Major, adapted by Ronald Kidd from the play by Tom Isbell, 2008 Reaching into her pocket, [Ethel] pulled out the paper, held it in the moonlight, and read, Beneath this brilliant metaphor will there treasure be.Whats a metaphor? I asked.Ethel said, Its a word that compares one thing to another, to show how they might be alike. Well, I said, if the metaphor is brilliant, maybe its the chandelier.They stared at me. I dont know why. If you ask me, the clue had seemed pretty obvious. You know, said Kermit, I think Archie is right. He turned to Ethel. I cant believe I just said that. Simile As Another Kind of Comparison A simile is a figure of speech  in which two fundamentally unlike things are explicitly compared, usually in a phrase introduced by  like  or  as, as these quotes demonstrate. Donita K. Paul, Two Tickets to the Christmas Ball, 2010 Whats a simile? asked Sandy. She looked to Cora for an answer. When you compare something to something else to get a better picture of it in your head. The clouds look like cotton balls. The edge of the snow shovel is sharp like a knife. Jay Heinrichs,  Word Hero: A Fiendishly Clever Guide to Crafting the Lines That Get Laughs, 2011 The simile is a metaphor that gives itself away. The moon is a balloon: thats a metaphor. The moon is like a balloon:  thats a simile. Oxymoron as an Apparent Contradiction An  oxymoron  is a figure of speech usually one or two words in which  seemingly  contradictory terms appear side by side. Bradley Harris Dowden, Logical Reasoning,  1993 A contradiction in terms is also called an oxymoron. Debates are often started by asking whether a term is an oxymoron. For example, is artificial intelligence an oxymoron? Jokes are often based in oxymorons; is military intelligence an oxymoron? Dianne Blacklock, False Advertising, 2007 Her husband got hit by a bus. What was Gemma supposed to say? More to the point, what did Helen want to hear? Well, said Gemma, going to sit on the bed beside Helen, who looked a little taken aback as she shifted to make room. You cant have an accident on purpose, Gemma went on. Thats an oxymoron. If there was intent, it wasnt an accident. I guess Im wondering if there isnt hidden intent in everything we do, said Helen. Hyperbole As Exaggeration Hyperbole is a figure of speech  in which exaggeration is used for emphasis or effect. Steve Atinsky, Tyler on Prime Time, 2002 ï » ¿Samantha and I sat in chairs that had been set up near the table. Whats hyperbole? I asked her. Its a fancy way of saying bull. Thomas S. Kane, The New Oxford Guide to Writing, 1988 Mark Twain was a master of hyperbole, as he reveals in this description of a tree after an ice storm: [I]t stands there the acme, the climax, the supremest possibility in art or nature, of bewildering, intoxicating, intolerable magnificence. One cannot make the words strong enough. Understatement as Beauty...or Sarcasm Understatement, the opposite of hyperbole, is a figure of speech  in which a writer or speaker deliberately makes a situation seem less important or serious than it is. Fiona Harper, English Lord, Ordinary Lady, 2008 She read what [Will] was going to say in his eyes before the words left his lips. I love you.So simple. No frills, no grandiose gestures. It was so Will. Suddenly, she understood the beauty of understatement. Steph Swainston, No Present Like Time, 2006 [Serein] sat in the doorway, legs out onto the half deck, huddling in his greatcoat. Comet, he said. You werent well. Is that understatement a new type of sarcasm youre experimenting with? Just a Figure of Speech: The Clichà © A  clichà ©Ã‚  is a  trite expression whose effectiveness has been worn out through overuse and excessive familiarity. David Punter, Metaphor, 2007 [I]t is interesting that the phrase just a figure of speech has become a clichà ©, as if for something to be a figure of speech in some way downgrades it. It may not be going too far to say that there is a certain denial going on in this view; that it is more convenient and comfortable to pretend that there are some speech forms which do not use figures of speech and thus give us access to a solid, incontrovertible perception of the real, in contrast to which the figure of speech is in some way abstracted, lacking in purchase. Laura Toffler-Corrie, The Life and Opinions of Amy Finawitz, 2010 Im quite sure he doesnt really think you have been abducted by aliens. It was just a figure of speech, like Oh, shes just little Miss Sunshine or What a clown. When you use expressions like that (which I totally never do), it doesnt mean a person is really an inhumanly hot solar ball or that theyre a member of the circus. Its not literal. Further Reading For more and deeper information on figures of speech, you can explore the following: Brief Introductions to 30 Figures of SpeechFigure of Sound  and  Figure of ThoughtLiterally and Figuratively: Commonly Confused Words100 Awfully Good Examples of Oxymorons100 Sweet SimilesThe 10 Greatest Hyperboles of All TimeTop 20 Figures of Speech

Annotated Bibliography On Text Copyright - 8931 Words

Main Title Subtitle Lorianne Shay Text Copyright  © Lorianne Shay All rights reserved. No part of this guide may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. Legal Disclaimer Legal Disclaimer The information contained in this book is not designed to replace or take the place of any form of medicine or professional medical advice. The information in this book has been provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. The information contained in this book has been compiled from sources deemed reliable, and it is accurate to the best of the Author s knowledge; however, the Author cannot guarantee its accuracy and validity and cannot be held liable for any errors or omissions. Changes are periodically made to this book. You must consult your doctor or get professional medical advice before using any of the suggested remedies, techniques, or information in this book. Upon using the information contained in this book, you agree to hold harmless the Author from and against any damages, costs, and expenses, including any legal fees potentially resulting from the application of any of the information provided by this guide. This disclaimer applies to any damages or injury caused by the use and application, whether directly or indirectly, of any advice or information presented, whether for breach of contract, tort, negligence, personal injury, criminal intent, orShow MoreRelatedEssay on How To Write Using the APA Writing Style1597 Words   |  7 Pagesdouble-spaced and a single paragraph around 150 to 250 words. Keywords may be listed to help researchers find ones work in databases. This should be done by centering the text Keyword (italicized) and then list the main keywords. The body of an APA paper Come back to. A literature review is a type of APA paper that summarizes a scientific text about ones topic or question. A literature review focuses on a specific topic of interest and includes a critical analysis where one would compare different literatureRead MoreBrianna Sparks. Mr. Zingale, Mr. Lehman. Us History, Language1685 Words   |  7 Pagesour Founding Father and millions of men and women who sacrificed themselves to keep America a safe and free country for the its people, bringing the best out of America to inspire and encourage the future generations to come. Annotated Bibliography Brody, David. â€Å"Brody File Exclusive: President Trump Says Persecuted Christians Will Be Given Priority As Refugees.† CBN.com (Beta), 27 Jan. 2017, www1.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2017/01/27/brody-file-exclusive-president-trump-says-persRead MoreWorkplace Citizenship8908 Words   |  36 Pages Prepared by Paul Black Sharon Bridgeman Elizabeth Foggo Trent Newman Nicola Rolls Adelle Sefton-Rowston Greg Shaw Peter Wignell Debbie Williams Materials in this Unit Information Guide are reproduced under section 40 (1A) of the Copyright Amendment Act 1980 (Cth) for the purposes of private study by internal and external students enrolled in this unit.  © Charles Darwin University CRICOS provider 00300K Major revisions February 2010 Minor revisions June 2012 Minor revisionsRead MoreVerizon Wireless1280 Words   |  6 Pagesinformation 720 times without being presented with a court order or warrant. In September 2007, Verizon Wireless did refuse to make their mobile phone network available to NARAL Pro-Choice America for a program which allows people to sign up for pro-choice text messages. They subsequently change the decision, saying It was an incorrect interpretation of a dusty internal policy that ... was designed to ward against communications such as anonymous hate messaging and adult materials sent to children. andRead More Use of Generalist Fair Use Defence in Australian Intellectual Property Law4952 Words   |  20 Pagesnbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The objective of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) is to protect those who create works, such as artistic works or literary works, as well as those other subject matter, such as films or sounds recordings, from those who would serve to exploit or profit from their labor, skill and creativity. But, wha t about those who use these protected works and other subject matter for interests different to the above? Such as for educational purposes or for broadcasting? Under the act, there areRead MoreBrahms Intermezzo No.3, Op.119 in C Major Analysis8658 Words   |  35 Pages9/29/12 MTO 13.3: Ricci, The Progress of a Motive in Brahms s Intermezzo op. 119, no. 3 Volume 13, Number 3, September 2007 Copyright  © 2007 Society for Music Theory Adam Ricci* The Progress of a Motive in Brahms’s Intermezzo op. 119, no. 3* ABSTRACT: Brahms’s Intermezzo op. 119, no. 3 is structured around a motive with two components—one melodic, one harmonic—that operate sometimes separately and sometimes together. The global harmonic trajectory of the piece is embodied in the combinationRead MoreMark 14:32-42 Essay2360 Words   |  10 PagesOne process used to interpret scripture is OIAP. OIAP stands for observation, interpretation, application, and praxis. This process helps you to understand scripture in its text. The passage that is going to be researched in this paper is Mark 14:32-42. My intent through this research is not only to understand the text, but also know how to apply its meaning to todays society. I hope to know more about who Jesus was during His time here on earth. I want to research the human aspect of ChristRead MoreInformation Security15951 Words   |  64 Pagesto writing the actual literature review following the theory of argument. What is a Literature Review? Novice researchers tend to approach the literature review as nothing more than a collection of summaries of papers or an elaborated annotated bibliography of multiple research manuscripts (Webster Watson, 2002). A meaningful literature review is much more. Hart (1998) defined the literature review as â€Å"the use of ideas in the literature to justify the particular approach to the topic, the selectionRead MoreElectronic Media13295 Words   |  54 Pagesprovides Drosophila (fruit fly) researchers with access to submitted genomic data, genetic maps of Drosophila, addresses of other Drosophila researchers, fly stock lists (directories of which labs supply which genetic varieties of fruit fly), and a bibliography of publications on Drosophila. The C. elegans community, which studies Nematode worms, uses ACEDB (A C. Elegans Data Base). Other model-organism-oriented biology subfields have similar digital disciplinary corpora. Submission of gene sequencesRead MoreMastering Graduate Stud ies 1e32499 Words   |  130 Pages639.7500 Copyright Information Grand Canyon University. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher  custom textbook usage The following icons have been created to assist students’ interactive experience in usage of this textbook. These will appear across the top or bottom of every page. Table of Contents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Underlined text Glossary

Stipends for College Athletes Free Essays

string(99) " or job field in this country would such a compensation to revenue ratio be considered acceptable\." It’s about time: Stipends for College Athletes Imagine being a college football star and finding out that a jersey representing your school with your name and number on the back is not only selling for $110 in stores nationally, but it is profiting higher than some professional sports jerseys. Now, imagine that you as that student-athlete will not be making a single penny off your institution using your name for monetary profit. Why you ask? Because according to the governing body of collegiate sports, the National Collegiate Athletic Association or NCAA, this would be considered an act that would bring an athlete out of his amateur status. We will write a custom essay sample on Stipends for College Athletes or any similar topic only for you Order Now Yet, it is okay to exploit that athlete’s talents as if he or she were a professional athlete and not compensate him or her. The NCAA started off as a small organization whose first objective was to solve an injury crisis in college football. However, with a growing governing power came more change. In 1852, Collegiate competition or â€Å"sport† made its debut in the form of a regatta race between Harvard and Yale (â€Å"Intercollegiate History of NCAA† 1). Soon after came the establishment of baseball and collegiate football. In the beginning, competition and funding was organized through student-run campaigns, and school officials had very little control over the intercollegiate sports movement. However, in 1905, after a number of deaths and serious injuries occurred to students playing collegiate football, a group of school officials were summoned together to make a Kastel 2 series of rules that would emphasize safety within the sport. Just five years later in 1910, this group became established and came to be known as the NCAA (â€Å"History of Intercollegiate Athletics† 1). As the years progressed, the NCAA established sanctions not just for football but all sports. Most notably in 1950, the NCAA established that â€Å"Students could be awarded scholarships based on their athletic ability, but the funds had to be administered by the financial aid office, not the athletic department. The amount was limited to tuition and fees, and payments from sources outside the university (e. g. , alumni boosters) were banned. † (qtd in â€Å"History of Intercollegiate Athletics† 2). NCAA officials wanted to stress that there was a clear line that needed to be drawn between a student athlete’s main goal of pursuit towards higher education and the distracting blue elephant in the room of their college sports teams operating like that of a professional organization. Hence, the term â€Å"amateurism†. On amateurism, the NCAA stated that â€Å"student-athletes shall be amateurs †¦ and should be protected from exploitation by professional and commercial enterprises,† ( â€Å"2011-12 NCAA Division I Manual† 1). Although the original intentions of this bylaw were to make sure professionalism in sport didn’t deter athletes away from higher education, too much has changed within intercollegiate sports for the same standards to apply today. The NCAA’s goal was too make sure these young players continued along their famous â€Å"amateurism† tagline, but we see them featured as unstoppable super heroes throwing down monstrous one handed dunks or making bone crushing tackles in commercials advertising for games as if they were professionals. The very Kastel 3 rganization controlling college sports has in itself become the exploiter of athletes in its own commercial pursuits. With this exploitation comes a very large elephant in the room spraying water at the American public from its trunk. The huge discrepancy between the monetary value of a scholarship the NCAA provides players with and the actual profits it generates from the player’s efforts is astounding. Although t he profit rapidly increases with college sports popularity, the benefits student athletes receive stay constant. The largest financial rewards a student athlete can receive for their athletic contributions are the benefits of free room and board, tuition, and a food plan. If we take the cost of these factors over the student athletes’ time at their institution, compared to the hundreds of billions of dollars generated in revenue from the NCAA we see something similar to Nike and their illegal sweatshop industry. It’s time for change to take place, college athletes should be rewarded like the professionals in the NCAA and conferences across the country market them to be. College athletes should receive stipends because there is a large discrepancy between what college athletes are worth and how much they are given, because athletic scholarships do not cover the full cost of living, and because the operation, money, and industry associated with college athletics is too great to still be titled â€Å"amateur†. The popularity of college sports and its value to entertainment is skyrocketing. The NCAA is the head organization in control of a hundred billion dollar industry. The disgusting disparity arrives at the difference between what Kastel 4 college athletes are rewarded with and the actual revenues the NCAA is collecting. For this discrepancy college athletes need to be rewarded for their effort and should be given stipends. Television broadcasting contracts, shoe and apparel deals, and commercial advertising rake in billions of dollars for the NCAA because of the participation of college students in sports. Last year alone, the NCAA’s total revenue was $777 million. Although the NCAA claims that 98 cents to every dollar is redistributed back into schools athletic programs for things like student services for athletes and athletic funding, it just so happens that there was a $29 million surplus which was claimed by the NCAA as â€Å"reserve† in 2010 (â€Å"Expenses vs. Revenue† 1). Apparently, saving up your change is beneficial. I never knew two-cent increments could lead to tens of millions of dollars. Such revenue comes from things like its newly acquired 14 year/$11 billion dollar deal with CBS-Turner over broadcasting rights for the NCAA tournament (O’Toole 1). It is kind of like a major motion picture company producing one of the highest generating films in history and letting its actors know that they won’t be receiving a financial reward for their contributions, but the work experience they are receiving should suffice. In no other industry or job field in this country would such a compensation to revenue ratio be considered acceptable. You read "Stipends for College Athletes" in category "Papers" They serve the title â€Å"amateurism† to American college athletes on a big plate of propaganda. In 2008, the NCAA teamed up with IMG College to lease its rights out to video game king Electronic Arts, making games such as NCAA Football and NCAA Basketball using the likeness of players they sold over 2. 5 million copies (Branch 1). The student athletes that were featured on these games had their Kastel 5 numbers reflected accurately, their physical attributes like race, hair style, and even their athletic prowess such as their speed, strength, passing/blocking/catching abilities all accurately associated with their real abilities in order to ensure players of the video games could maneuver round the field like their favorite college superstar. There isn’t anything â€Å"amateur† about exploiting college student athlete’s likeliness in a video game for profit; the double standard is disgusting. However, the NCAA isn’t the only one caught with their arm elbow deep in the cookie jar. Such conferences such as the SEC, ACC, and the BIG 10 are generating bi llion dollar contracts for individual television networks while student-athletes are being kept in the dark for their contributions. For instance, the SEC conference will be earning $55 million over 15 years from a CBS deal, and a 15 year deal with ESPN that cashes out to $150 million (â€Å"Winners and Losers† 1). Despite the players being the ones who are generating the audiences, none of these profits from the NCAA or the conferences are being returned back to the students directly. In fact, if we were to try to mathematically calculate the value of how much an athletes room and board fees come out to divided by the amount of time they actually put into being an athlete most are living just above, if not below, the poverty line. For example, a recent study found Duke University basketball players based upon their generated revenue for the school to be worth $1,025,650 . Yet, after calculation (scholarship value / number of hours each puts in) they were found to be living just $732 above the poverty line (â€Å"Research-NCPA† 1). After being worth over one million dollars to their university, they are only rewarded approximately a $200,000 education. Kastel 6 Current college athletes and those from the past are starting to realize this exploitation more and more especially as profit from television deals and sponsorships become more lucrative. Almost every month the American public is presented with a new story of how a college athlete unfairly received either a monetary reward or a free service because of his athletic talents. We get mad at the young athletes and criticize them for such actions but can we really blame them? They are superstars generating attention, money, and huge popularity to their institutions and they aren’t receiving anything different than the kid slapping together the cymbals after every touchdown. College athletes are taking gifts and money because they are becoming aware of the NCAA’s exploitation and on top of that most of their scholarships don’t even cover their full cost of living. In the perfect world, when watching our favorite college athletes on TV we like to imagine that they came from strong households with parents who paid for their training and had all the opportunities to be successful. We would like to think the tattooed face of a little girl on our favorite college point guard’s arm is just his little sister not his daughter who he thinks about trying to send enough money too every week. Fact of the matter is, college athletes across the country have a variety of circumstances that consume any opportunities for extra money. Things like coming from broken home families, having children at home, or coming from a low economic neighborhoods cause many student athletes to stress over where their next dollar could come from. Things like clothes, gas, toiletries, amenities, fun activities, extra food for the room, or a meal away from dining hall are all things that Kastel 7 are essential to have money for in college. However, college athletes can only be awarded a scholarship. It bewilders America when we hear of cases of college athletes accepting sums of money under the table in what is becoming an increasingly large black market. However, this happens all the time. We only hear about the ones who get caught. Yet, the players aren’t the ones to blame. According to a study conducted by Drexel University Department of Sport Management, the average scholarship shortfall, or what the average student athlete had to spend out of his own pocket in 2010-11, was approximately $3,222 (â€Å"Research-NCPA† 2). When the scholarships we have don’t cover the student-athletes full cost of living how do we expect them to be able to pay for the necessities of living? If a player has been out of gas for three weeks and is out of toiletries can we really blame him from accepting cash in a handshake from a booster? College athletes’ time is consumed by their sports. According to a survey conducted with 21,000 Division I, II, and III athletes, â€Å"Football players in the NCAA’s Division I Bowl Subdivision (formerly known as Division I-A) said they spent an average of 44. hours a week on their sport — playing games, practicing, training and in the training room — compared with a little less than 40 hours on academics† (qtd. in Wieberg 1). This staggering statistic reveals that college athletes are actually spending more of their time on their sport then their actual school work. It is even more staggering when the NCAA’s bylaw requires that student a thletes only spend 20 hours a week on their sport. With these types of time commitments and dedication to their sports, college athletes don’t have time to have a job. This dilemma intensifies the problem of Kastel 8 aving a scholarship shortfall. If there are necessary things to pay for and athletes don’t have the necessary time to work where is the money supposed to come from? College athletes should receive a stipend of $2,500 a semester to ensure that any necessary cost outside of their scholarship can be covered. By introducing this stipend the number of NCAA infractions relating to athletes taking money will dramatically decrease due to the fact that they won’t need to anymore. One might say that this would anger regular students who do not receive such benefits. However, according to one statistical survey taken by 458 college students, 58% of them believed that college athletes deserved to receive stipends (â€Å"College Students Perceptions† 1). This study demonstrates that not only would regular students not be upset by college athletes receiving the reward they deserve, but in fact they recognize the need for it. By offering something to college athletes (scholarship) which still requires them to spend such a large sum out of their own pockets we are basically tempting them to fall into the illegal activities of the black market and potentially jeopardize their academic futures. Stipends must be rewarded and reform is necessary now. The NCAA cannot expect a player with a hungry child at home to refuse money from a booster, just as it cannot place the term â€Å"amateurism† around an industry it exploited to be so focused around money. The NCAA suggests that if we were to provide college student athletes with stipends it would take away the â€Å"wholeness† that college sports still represent by replacing their â€Å"amateur† title with that of â€Å"professionalism†. However, college sports which once symbolized the unselfish competitive spirit of America and were Kastel 9 nce run by student led organizations with no influence from school officials or corrupt institutions have already become a capital venture. This is not because of the introduction of a stipend reward system, but rather because the money, operation, and industry the NCAA created around college sports has made it too professional in its financial pursuits to be co nsidered â€Å"amateur†. The term â€Å"amateurism† is no longer fit to represent college sports but rather a propaganda add by the NCAA to allow them to continue their exploitive efforts. One of the largest indications of the pursuit of this commercial enterprise is the unbelievable amount of money that college coaches are being paid. In 2010, Alabama coach Nick Saban committed to a contract that would pay him $4 million dollars a season (Low 1). Most FBS Division 1 institutions athletic departments have a hard time generating any profit at all, but the NCAA allows schools to present astonishing contracts to coaches in order to point their team in the right direction. Yet, the NCAA sees a student athlete receiving a small stipend more of a venture towards professionalism than this? Another indication that college sports can no longer be placed under the â€Å"amateur† title is apparent in the evolution of college stadiums. Today the illustration of a new corporate sponsorship is apparent in almost every stadium with things like â€Å"Ohio State University’s new $105 million Schottenstein Center, 110 luxury boxes at Neyland Stadium (University of Tennessee), and the University of Michigan spending $7. 4 million to renovate Michigan Stadium† (qtd. in â€Å"College Student’s Perceptions† 2). The NCAA isn’t keeping the industry around college sports simple with basic venues and humble salaries for their coaches. Instead they Kastel 10 create something that is slowing resembling that of professional sports environments. For these exploitations the NCAA can no longer hold college athletics today to a standard of remaining â€Å"amateurism†. The industry surrounding it has far surpassed that point and it is time we reward our college athletes like the professionals we market them to be. Many people argue that even if the NCAA does come to its senses and passes a law regulating stipends for Division I institutions, Title IX implications would make it almost impossible to implement stipends. Those critics argue that if stipends were approved, Title IX would then regulate all student athletes at the school to receive stipends due to equal opportunity. The sum of money required to be able to provide every student athlete with this, critics say, would be impossible for even successful athletic departments to afford. It is correct that such a reward would be possible for schools to afford. Stipends should only be given to the top three sports that are generating the most revenue. It would create more of an incentive for programs to be successful, and it would reward student athletes of the teams who were having the greatest success. Title IX cannot be applied to the stipend system because it is outdated and needs to be reformed. Title IX was originally created for the racial movement in order to encourage what, at that time, was a change that needed to be enforced (â€Å"In Defense† 1). Today, many schools athletic departments actually lose money by trying to comply with the outdated law. In order to equally match the number of guy to girl scholarships a university might be forced to eliminate a men’s revenue generating sport such as hockey and instead Kastel 11 add a women’s sport that loses money ( â€Å"In Defense† 2). Title IX is outdated and if a stipend system is established, the top 3 revenue generating teams should receive a stipend. Whether the NCAA wants to accept it or not, their exploitive actions in pursuit of commercial profit have eliminated any sense of college sports today seeming â€Å"amateur†. Because of this exploitation it is time for college student athletes to finally receive the proper reward they have deserved for a good amount of time. College athletes should receive stipends because there is a large discrepancy between what college athletes are worth and how much they are given. This is because athletic scholarships do not cover the full cost of living, and also because the operation, money, and industry associated with college athletics is too great to still be titled â€Å"amateur†. By affording these stipends to college athletes, maybe just maybe, when that athlete walks into the store and sees that jersey with his name on the back he might be financially secure enough with his living expenses to be able to purchase it. Works Cited â€Å"2011-2012 NCAA Division I Manual (August 2011). † NCAA Manual. NCAA. org. Web. 09 Nov. 2011. Branch, Taylor. The Shame of College Sports – Magazine – The Atlantic. † The Atlantic — News and Analysis on Politics, Business, Culture, Technology, National, International, and Life – TheAtlantic. com. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. â€Å"College Students’ Perceptions On The Payment Of Intercollegiate Student-Athletes – Statistical Data Included – Page 2 | College Student Journal. † Find Articles | News Articles, Magazine Back Issues Reference Articles on All Topics. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. â€Å"History of Intercollegiate Athletics and the NCAA. † World Scientific Publishing Co. , 12 May 2009. Web. â€Å"In Defense of Collegiate Athletics: The Case Against Paying Student-Athletes – Garnet And Black Attack. † Garnet And Black Attack – For South Carolina Gamecocks Fans. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. â€Å"Intercollegiate History of the NCAA. † NCAA Public Home Page NCAA. org. Web. 09 Nov. 2011. Low, Chris. â€Å"Nick Saban Commits to Alabama Crimson Tide through 2017 Season – ESPN. † ESPN: The Worldwide Leader In Sports. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. O’Toole, Thomas. â€Å"NCAA Reaches 14-year Deal with CBS/Turner for Men’s Basketball Tournament, Which Expands to 68 Teams for Now. News, Travel, Weather, Entertainment, Sports, Technology, U. S. World – USATODAY. com. Web. 17 Nov. 2011. â€Å"Research | National College Players Association. † Home | National College Players Association. Web. 18 Nov. 2011. â€Å"Revenue Vs. Expenses. † NCAA Public Home Page – NCAA. org. Web. 17 Nov. 2011. Wieberg, Steve. â€Å"Stu dy: College Athletes Are Full-time Workers – USATODAY. com. † News, Travel, Weather, Entertainment, Sports, Technology, U. S. World – USATODAY. com. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. â€Å"Winners and Losers In SEC TV Deal. † College Gridiron 365. Web. 17 Nov. 2011. How to cite Stipends for College Athletes, Papers

Gun Control Argumentative Essay Example For Students

Gun Control Argumentative Essay Outline1 What is this article about?2 Introduction3 The Second Amendment4 The Debate5 What exactly should be done?6 Conclusion What is this article about? Nowadays gun control is a controversial problem in the USA. Politicians, scientists, and other experts actively discuss this argument and express opinions related either to a pro-gun control or to an anti-gun control position. Because of the importance and the global scale of the issue of gun control, students are often required to write argumentative essays on this topic to develop critical thinking and reveal the tendencies in public opinion. This article provides a free example of an essay on gun control. It consists of an introduction with an arguable thesis, several main body paragraphs with arguments and examples supporting the thesis, and conclusion. Introduction We will write a custom essay on Gun Control Argumentative specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Everybody knows that a considerable argument over the place and role of gun control exists in America nowadays. Because of the growing number of tragedies caused by handguns, experts and authorities argue over the right to possess the gun. The main advantage of the gun is the chance for people to save themselves as they can defend themselves from danger. On the other hand, the free use of weapons is sometimes unjustified and can lead to an increase of fatal outcomes caused by violence. The fact is that the increasingly negative tendencies in America show that the policies concerning gun control should be reevaluated and reassessed. The Second Amendment A long time ago, when The United States Constitution was developed, the government constructed a set of rules regulating the most basic rights of the citizens of the United States. These rules were called amendments. They were intended to determine what is acceptable for people living in the United States and what is not. The major part of the Constitution is the second amendment. The history related to this second amendment dates back to the nineteenth century. At that time, the Framers decided to write the articles of the Constitution. The second amendment guaranteed the citizens of the United States the right to carry firearms. In particular, according to the second amendment, people are allowed to use firearms against a threat that can in some way endanger their lives. The Debate While the free use of firearms is intended to protect oneself, handguns are actually often used as the means for an attack. Statistics show that more than 31,000 deaths and much more nonfatal wounds annually are caused by the use of firearms. Unfortunately, the majority of these deaths are related to intentionally violent actions. In America, violence as a cause of fatal outcomes has been growing in recent years, and that is why the debate on gun control is even more important than ever before. People argue whether the use of firearms meets the standards of the existing laws as the number of tragedies proves the opposite. What is more, numerous experts claim that the number of tragic outcomes will be much less than what we have now in the United States if the laws regulate the use of firearms properly. Thus, people call for the government to reevaluate the role of firearms as a protective measure and as a means for an attack and to revisit the regulations of the second amendment. In particular, as the disadvantages of the free use of handguns seem to outweigh the potential advantages, certain restrictions should be developed to protect people from armed violence. The situation will improve if the government proposes certain ways of fighting the excessive gun use and finds new approaches intended to eliminate gun activity. .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f , .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .postImageUrl , .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f , .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:hover , .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:visited , .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:active { border:0!important; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:active , .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u1bcce486e016688f571810f8433c585f:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Harrison bergeron 2 EssayWhat exactly should be done? As it has already been said, the number of tragedies occurring annually because of the use of firearms shows that America needs stricter laws for regulating gun activity. That is why one should understand what measures can be taken to put end to the excessive gun use with violent intentions. Nowadays, numerous gun rights groups are being created to redefine people’s rights to bear firearms under today’s circumstances. One of the major gun rights group is the National Rifle Association. The members of this group believe that guns are not the objects to be blamed for the final decision of a particular person. What is more, they state that the possibility that one person is carrying a gun is the only factor that can stop another person with a gun. These thoughts show controversy in what the use of handguns actually means to society. Thus, one should carefully reevaluate the existing laws regulating gun use and decide on whether gun control will be risky or beneficial to society at large. For this purpose, there is an importance to define the role of the past and existing regulations on gun use. In particular, the most effective gun control policies include a ban on high-capacity checks, a restriction on certain assault weapons. As for the universal background checks, this policy is rather ambiguous. It implies that all the financial, criminal, and other records of people and organizations are controlled. Particularly, the history of a person buying weapons and his/her mental state is checked. This policy is extremely important as the majority of events involving gun use with violent intentions are related to mentally ill people. Besides, people are checked on drug and alcohol consumption as these are the two factors that can reinforce violent behavior. Conclusion All things considered the permission for the weapon in the United States is a relevant issue that needs to be discussed and solved. Nowadays, as the number of tragedies involving gun use is increasing, people argue that stricter laws and regulations should be created to control gun activity. Opinions differ, and various gun rights group express significant arguments against limiting the right to carry firearms. At the same time, it seems that in this situation, the disadvantages outweigh the possible advantages. Thus, effective ways of approaching the issue of gun activity should be found. For instance, the laws should be based on the existing regulations including universal background checks, a prohibition of high-capacity checks.